After a century during which two resources – petrol and finance – have been major contributors to the radical transformation of the relationships between humans and nature, we now find ourselves confronted with the physical limits of unprecedented economic growth associated with social and environmental dumping.
Faced with this mode of linear development, which provokes the rapidly increasing scarcity of numerous resources, basic reason would require us to elaborate a more global and collective vision of development using a “non Promethean conception of progress”4. Michel Serres calls for a third revolution on Earth5 and Joseph Stiglitz sets out on a quest for “Another World”6.
The time has come for us to reconsider our relationship to the problematique of resources as a whole as well as our relationship to public goods and services which the market cannot provide : universal access to common goods and fundamental rights (education, health, quality of life, access to knowledge / culture, software, social networks, etc.). In this approach, scientists, in the broadest sense, are well placed to signpost the way since through the very nature of their profession they tend to think on a long-term basis and cross the borders between subject areas (see, for example, the ERC Lascaux program website http://www.droit-aliments-terre.eu and the blog http://leblogdefrancoisdutilleul.bl...).
The new ENS de Lyon intends to make a strong commitment to developing and exploiting its interdisciplinary potential by creating the Interdisciplinary Institute for Resources and Public Goods in order to perpetuate the approach and results of this conference.
In concrete terms, although comprehending and optimizing all resources represent extremely urgent tasks, the implementation of vast bodies of optimized resources in order to ensure their rational and integrated management constitutes a real societal challenge. This challenge requires a convergence of knowledge and the reciprocal exchange of know-how. The cross-fertilization of the concrete and the conceptual can give rise to new spaces for the redefinition of the perimeters of public goods, their more globally just attribution and the rational and integrated management of resources in their entirety. This is why, in the present situation, this problematique should be placed before all the other major issues which it can include and for which it provides essential foundations (biodiversity, climate warming / disturbance, energy crisis, etc.).
This manifesto is an invitation for scholars from every subject area to join the workgroup focusing on the vast problematique of resources with the aim of adapting their uses to a more human, more sustainable, less inegalitarian vision of the world which would show greater respect for the environment.
(Chollet M, Le Monde Diplomatique, Sept. 2009, p. 23)
(“La 3e révolution sur la Terre ou le non-dit du Monde”, in La Recherche / Le Monde, Nov-Dec. 2009 Hors Série, pp 94-98 and Temps des crises, 2009, Le Pommier)
(Making Globalization Work, Norton, 2006)
(Chollet M, Le Monde Diplomatique, Sept. 2009, p. 23)
(“La 3e révolution sur la Terre ou le non-dit du Monde”, in La Recherche / Le Monde, Nov-Dec. 2009 Hors Série, pp 94-98 and Temps des crises, 2009, Le Pommier)
(Making Globalization Work, Norton, 2006)